Talk:Ravenea glauca

"This species can attain heights more than most references claim." Box to right says 30 ft.; various California references quote 15 ft.; PACSOA says 8m/26ft, leaving sentence somewhat vague. Can this be more clearly defined? As: "more than the 15-26 ft. most references claim."

• Good suggestion.............Done. If that's the only thing you can find, then you're not trying as hard, or I'm getting better. (Has to be the latter) :) Dypsisdean 20:23, 7 July 2007 (PDT)
• I'm not done yet. Get out of the way. : )Kim 20:36, 7 July 2007 (PDT)
• I knew it was too good to be true. But what a great team we make. Gilbert and Sullivan, Simon and Schuster, Funk and Wagnel, Laurel and Hardy, Cheech and Chong................................ Dypsisdean 21:29, 7 July 2007 (PDT)
•  :^D Right, I get it...Ben and Jerry, Smith and Wesson..... So what do you think about adding metric measurements throughout the Palmpedia? I could make it part of my occasional editing, it would be easy enough. Think globally...
• I think it's an excellent idea. The only reason I was balking was because I am metrically challenged, and would need to look up every single measurement. But if everyone would chip in, I think it's a no brainer. It's probably about time for me to "get with it" anyway. :-) And I agree with you on the italics as well. I just wanted to make sure it was as easy as the two quotes thingy in all instances. It appears as if it is. So, feel free to do that as well, as you're browsing. Mahalo Dypsisdean 20:44, 8 July 2007 (PDT)